http://wikileaks.ch/

Ok so lately this newest web phenomenon better known as Wikileaks has been raising all kinds of eyebrowns in both the media and in Washington.Everything from all of these so called classified documents that the site's administrators seem to keep getting their hands on and releasing to the general public to the website's founder Austrailian born Julian Assangefighting criminal allegations pitted against him which he claims are designed by the powers that be to silence him and his "truth"release to the public about the U.S. and its foriegn affairs that we dont always hear about.



To be frankly honest alot of the material that Wikileaks releases on there website which has now been taken down by the web provider does not surprise,atleats not the educated American(such as myself) because we knew this back of the woods stuff was going on with our shady government since the 1960's anyway.Another reason why it does not impress is because alot of it just seems like routine protocol type of stuff like the documents released on the Afghan War casualty figures that suggested the Pentagon has been lying to the public and news media about our casualty figures there.As well as the supposed murder of innocent civilians.





As of right now,Asange is in a hot spot but has an advantage seeing that he has put the U.S. government in a hotspot as well.They are scared to touch him or make it seem as if he committed suicide all of a sudden or died of a heart attack lol And they also cant really stop him from "leaking"info to American people who are already upset with the powers that be and under the U.S. constitution Amendment station Freedom of the press ,have a right to know.

Just today more controversy as wikileaks tries to get their website back up and its founder continues to ward off the latest allegations of criminal sexual assault coming from officials in the Netherlands(he has been put on Interpol's Most Wanted list lmao).


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/04/national/main7118464.shtml?tag=mncol;lst;1

The U.S State department now finds itself on defense against claims from an anonymous source that it sent emails to students at Columbia University advising them not to download any material from wikileak's sight as it would be a violation of federal law and considering stealing classified information and would also "call into question your ability to deal with confidential information".A spokeperson for the foriegn affairs department claims the email which was intercepted by Culumbia's School of International and Public Affairs Office faculty,is a hoax as are other numerous so called "classified material realeased by Wiki this passing weak in an effort to "thwart the questioning of its own legitamacy,said State department official Philip J. Crowley .

I personally think that some but not all of the material released by wikileaks is real and comes from disgruntled government workers in high places that are sore over lack of promotion and acknowledgement for their work.I am and have always been weary of organizations and individuals that claim to know "top secret" informantion or scream CONSPIRACY! every time the wind blows but I do believe that if legit,infomation that is released about things the government wants to keep secret is a right of the American public who elect and count on government officials to do their jobs right.

I think the cockiness in Washington of alot of politicians and specialists lead them to be under the false assumption that the government is like a special private club where the few control and keep their dirty little secrets away from the many.So if and that is a legitmate if wiki is legit then i say more power to them and GO GO GO Mr.Assange!

I thinkt he key problem nowdays with the internet is that you dont know who is real and whos not because anyone can post anything and all you can do is take it at face value.I take that realization everywhere I go online,even here on my own website lol.

wann know what I thinK?I think the news is giving this website way too much credibility and attention.I mean first of all whos to say that all the crap that wikileaks comes out with is true or classified?There are all kind of blog websites out there claiming conspiracies and legitimacy.I think some of the documents are true and some aint lol.

I believe that wikileaks is a legitimate whistle blowing site but I do also believe that they are being served with too much publicity.They were actually better off staying discreet as possible.The news people in America are what is making the situation for them alot worse by putting the government in the spotlight where they dont want to be.Most of the documents they released were proven to be actualy documents from the U.S.,Canada and other officialities.But the things in the documents are really not that surprising actually.A good example is everyone knew there were high casualties in Aghanistan and Iraq and that coalition soldiers were abusing and killing civilians and prisoners by just watching the regular news.Its almost like Wiki just backs up and re-confirms everything already revealed.

These constant sex allegations against the founder of wikileaks are quite disturbing,even one allegation that he has disease and is trying to spread through sex connection.I hope they are just rumors.

From what I hear it's best to not read Wikileaks,
if you're planning on a career move for any
government job in the nearest future, as they'll
soon be requiring I.P. Adresses of sites you've
visited in the last 5 years (US).

Wow! so now we're threatening people with losing
their jobs or ruining their careers for reading "forbidden"
material on the Internet? Yeah! and I thought we live in
America, not China. Cencorship... Isn't this freedom BS,
great?

There are interesting documents on Wiki but alot of it is just confirmed heresay not actual evidence of government wrong doing.I mean the site and its founder themselves have been caught up in 10 times more controversy then the actual classifieds they post.

As far as the choice of the many lower class allowing themselves to be governed by a smaller upper class yes true but the material and financial aspect of the situation too.The upper class have the reserouces to surround themselves with the support they need(whether be legally,militarily,politically etc.) to be able to form and keep a strangle hold on the key parts of society and the world.See you dont have to conquer or even convince everyone only the key figues and locations because everyone derives their life line from virtually the same source.For example if there is one lake bed of water where an entire village gets their water supply from and there isnt another one for miles and miles;say a warlord recruits and arms a group of enforcers and surrounds that lake bed declaring it his own.Then charges everyone for access and declares himself governor over the region.How many people do you think will challenge him?O some will because there is always the renegade or sepertist(as there should be) but most wont,because most dont want trouble just normalty so the village people abide by the new rules and submit to get what they want and need....