Skewed but interesting:

Natural racism is actually a literally incorrect term,but it is supposed to be the theory that racism is natural with the natural instinct of "herd mentality" of other non human life forms (schools of fish,cow herds,bird groups,wolf packs etc.) as scientific evidence of this.The theorists say that this form of logic proves that the theory that racism is taught is actually the wrong way around and that people actually teach themselves to diversify thus acting against nature.They also theorize that given the rest of nature the only reason Humans make and issue about race and other differences and force diversity is because complexity of the human brain causes us to notice the similarities and differences with one another.

I saw this in a paper ad flier for an upcoming seminar by these deceived "theorists" who claim to be geologists from Beglium at nearby UCLA campus on June 17th.You know what?Im going to go there and give them an ear full when they ask for questions from the audience .

Aside from all the technical and and obvious intelligence factors as to why this theory is wrong,if you look at the rest of nature aside from humanity you see inferior forms of life that are forced to survive in one single habitat and have to make the best of the enviorment around them to preserve their own life where as human beings have a multitude of selections because we are able to comprehend,learn and adapt faster than ANY other specie on planet Earth.My theory is that other living beings only stick with life forms that resemble themselves because of a sense of security and a natural system that requires a team effort rather than an individual effort in order for that specie to survive(albeit bee hives,ant colonies for instance).I do not think that it is by predjudice choice like these geologists are claiming that other mammals and life forms choose to group with one another and its also not just about visual preference either.Many animals sense both prey and predator,freind and foe alike by the sense of smell,they can also sense agression and fear in this manner so for someone to come and say that every form of nature prefers deliberate descrimination of the other based on type is just simply ridiculous to me.But what do you think?

People nowdays seem to get science and doctrine confused on a great degree.For Example the Bible tells many stories including a story about the parting of the Red Sea.Now most true believing Christians beleive that many thousands of years ago this did actually happen,not because its logical but because they beleive in what the Bible says.Though there is no scientific analysis or research find to prove that this actually happened.However at the same time there are other stories in the Bible that do have some scientific backing such as the great flood.Researchers in the 70's and 80's found evidence of past water linings as high as the 5 mile mark of Mt.Everest.That being said I was born and baptized as a Christian however I have learned over the years to keep religious belief seperate from logical probability or scientific fact.As we know with say the suicide terrorist for example confusing doctrine and phsyical reality can not only be ignorant but a VERY dangerous thing yet men have blindly done this for decades.

The fact is as I see it there are different forms of human beings just like there are any other specie and while it is a good thing to diversify,because of the complexity of our brains we are forcing ourselves to want to be around others that do not resemble us as Isis said;when you look at the rest of nature it makes perfect sense.Infact I have recently realized something that alot of devoutly religious southern baptists(which make up a largely Afro-American base) dont realize.Christianity itself like Cathlocism are revised versions of Judasim which began in Africa.Also what many deeply religious black Americans dont realize is that like the European custom of speaking the English language,Christianity was adopted by their slave ancestors once they were taken from Africa and forced labor for and communicate with caucasion people.Black people worship Christianity and speak English for the same reason Mexicans worship Cathlocism and speak spanish(Spain is a long way from Mexico lol think about it)..forced diversity.

When you look at other forms of nature what happens when one culture or sub group tries to impede upon or mistakenly invades the space of another?They usually fight like cats and dogs.Ant wars ring a bell lol.Even Pneumonia is the result of the body's immune system producing to much mucus to the point where it sinks down into the lower bronchial air ways known as the Aveoli in an over-attempt the capture and eject(through couphing and sneezing) germs that it detects are forgeign to the body.

I dont think there is any such thing as natural racism its just that that particular theory sounds more politically correct to certain people who think that way.

Its not natural racism its just nature.And yes it is natural for even human beings to identify with others that more resemble themselves however I think the key flaw to this theory is that it only sheds light on the support of differentials and similarites between people's race or skin color.There are other classes and types of ways that people identify with each other.Financial status,gender,sexual orientation,sports like,nationality,political views,age, etc. there are just so many different choices that can be added to that pact.

Where I work in the lunch room for instance there are groups that just choose to socialize and sit with each other for one reason or another on break and hardly inter mingle with anyone outside of their little social circle.These groups include male,female,asian,white,black and latino American employees.

People do indentify with those much like themselves but that could mean an assortment of things.

lol Natural racism Lilly?I've never even heard of such a thing and doubt it even exists.If your talking about natural instinct of most living things that has nothing or little to do with just visual comparison,it has alot to do with sense of smell and habitat.I mean the way I see it animals hunt down,kill and eat other animals raw,the thought of taste never enters their mind so why would the thought of discrimination?In the wild its about survial not preference or taste(in every sense of the word) see what Im saying?If animals are clinging to other forms of specie like them it has more to do witha sense of security then a sense of liking or predjudice towards others thata re different.

Just my 2 cent

In Nature its not racism,its simply instinct.Animals instinctively group with the same specie of their kind the same way predators instinctively hunt prey and grazers instinctively eat grass or plants.Animals,I highly doubt have a sense of color preference.

"Natural Racism"?lol now thats a new one.

Im sure the Nazi's could refer to this blashphemy as a support reference while they where setting death camps on Solaviskk and elsewhere here.